Gender Preference Among a Sample of Married Women Attending Selected Primary Healthcare Centers in Baghdad Governorate in 2019

Main Article Content

Farah Rifaat AL- AGELE
Batool Ali Hassan

Abstract

Background: Gender preferences is an important social indicator measuring extent of equity between male and female which reflects underlying socioeconomic and cultural and believes patterns that show a strong preferences for one gender over the other. Objectives: To describe gender preference in married women attending primary health care centers in Baghdad governorate. Methods: A descriptive cross sectional (convenient sample) study had been conducted at Primary Health Care Centers in Baghdad governorate at. AL-Rusafa Health Directorate and AL-Karkh Health, From1st of February to 15th of May2019. Results: Among the 400 study participant The mean age of the study participants was 26.7±5.8 SD,51.8% aged between 25-35 years, About participant family composition desire results showed that less than half of the participant (45.3%) prefer more male child ,43.5% preferred equal number of male and female and only 6.2% preferred female while the remaining 5% has no difference ,Regarding the more effective child gender to the family and community showed that about half of the participant (54%) believed that the male is more effective to the family and community followed by (28%) believed that there was no difference between them and only (18%) said that the female is more effective. Conclusion: Nearly half of the participants exhibit a gender preference for male child , About half of the participants believed that the male is more effective to the family, Almost all participants refuses the idea of intending abortion for undesired fetus.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
AL- AGELE, F. R., & Hassan, B. A. (2020). Gender Preference Among a Sample of Married Women Attending Selected Primary Healthcare Centers in Baghdad Governorate in 2019. Scientific Journal of Medical Research, 4(14), 31–36. https://doi.org/.
Section
Review Article